Version 1.0.1 Dumb Crap that Brice said one month!

Brice Wellington -- RAW!

What is Brice Wellington Raw?

"Brice Wellington: Raw!" essentially is the collected public postings of Brice Wellington from alt.atheism and the Boston Bullet BBS, unedited, complete with the material he was replying to (if applicable). I grew tired of Editing and formatting his words of Wisdom, as found in the first 3 FAQ files, and since most of his writing is repetitious, thought it would be best to just add the latest Brice-Quotes to a big file, with a minimal amount of editing. Enjoy!
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.religion.mormon,alt.atheism
From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington )
Subject: Re: Bryce's Prurient Posts (was Re: Masturbation!!!?)
Date: 11 Oct 1995 10:53:17 GMT

 timh@halcyon.com (Tim Hill) writes:

>Actually, porno is only one link. After reading your posts, I find it
>very hard to resist the temptation to touch myself. Please refrain
>from publishing more of your vile smut.

It is not smut, its a simple fact masturbation is a root of evil.

Its only good for so long then yu have to find something else, maybe a
friend to do it with you, then too you, then you do it to him, THUS
homosexuality.

It could also lead to rape of either gender.


From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Newsgroups: alt.atheism Subject: Re: I Will Return In The Name OF God! Date: 2 Sep 1995 10:46:30 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 29 JosephX writes: >Don't do anything you wouldn't do? > >Let's see...so far we know that Brice has had spanked his teenage >daughters after removing their underwear, beat his wife, and >masturbated with such inexpertise that he lost a testicle. > >I think I'm safe here. That old atheistic trick is at use again! Twisting my words! Sue had me undressing them and you have masturbating over a daughter! YOU ARE A PERVERT!!!!!! FREAK OF NATURE!!!! Why did you specify underwear! DID I SAY UNDERWEAR! NO!!!!!! And I didn't undress them either! Lets get it straight! I had their pants down, yes underwear too but I didn't mention it! And I spanked them! That is ALL!!!! BriceW Man of God!
From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Newsgroups: alt.atheism Subject: Re: Masturbation!!! Date: 24 Aug 1995 13:26:57 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 16 In <41h3rq$iio@globe.indirect.com> susanm@indirect.com (Susan C. Mitchell) writes: >Was that the part about how he never spanked his daughters until they >were fourteen and fifteen, and *then* he made them take their >underpants off? Or was there something even weirder, that I missed? Your twisting my words! An old atheist trick! I simply said that I had their pants down and over my knees (for a spanking) and they were 14 & 15 at the time and I'll do it doday at 19 & 20 if its required! BriceW Man Of GOD!
Article: 232052 Newsgroups: alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: His Daughters' Hymens by Brice Wellington Date: 2 Oct 1995 00:44:58 GMT malkinb7@ix.netcom.com (Michelle Malkin ) writes: >Look, folks, he's now trying to weasel out of it. After describing in >fairly good detail all the awful things he's supposed to have done to >his daughters, he now is saying that he made it all up. I don't think >the fear of the lord has anything to do with this. More likely, it's >the fear of the law. I hope that someone does get the law to >investigate him and the situation with his daughters. Someone in the >Boston area has to report this guy. I'm not weasling out of anything, I truly believe its the parents right to inspect, in this day and age, responsibility. The whole city of Boston cry, but it doesn't matter, there is nothing to cry about.
Article: 232072 Newsgroups: alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Hey Brice- READ THIS!!! Date: 2 Oct 1995 03:12:14 GMT "Jeff X. Mink" writes: >What's a devout christian full of hate like yourself doing reading up >on atheism anyway? I'm not reading up on atheism, its enough for me to read posts diected at me, attacking me never mind reading atheism. I'm here to introduce a better way of life if you all let me, you all keep throwing me off track.
Msg#:21892 *Flame Brice* 10-10-95 07:37:15 From: BRICE WELLINGTON To: PSYCHO DAVE Subj: REPLY TO MSG# 21885 (OBSESSION!!) The trilifon I NEVER take, well, I tried it once to see what it would do. It didn't do anything so I don't take it. It is an all purpose pill like Buspar which they tried to get me to take before but never did. I was setup the firt time, it was approx 5 months before I had the testicle out, they could see no reason for the pain but I persisted so one time when I went to the health center they were waiting for me. They had no just reason to send me there, there was an article on CNN last week about that problem, I'm not the only one who was set up. The idea was for me not to eat for 48 hours, due to abdominal pain that eventually went down as far as the left testicle, but when I got there I signed a paper for self committment(sp) thus giving me the legal right to refuse treatment such as no food for 48 hours. When I don't eat I get very sick and at times very violent, I don't deny I get violent and can be dangerouse in that state, which is why I refused to not eat for 48 hours. A 2-3 day stay turned into three weeks when the Lord made them let me go. Sometime after that I had the testicle out. I don't go to therapy, I go and am asked how are you, I say fine, then they say goodbye see you next week, and thats it.
From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Newsgroups: alt.atheism Subject: Re: Masturbation!!! (What's with you people???) Date: 30 Sep 1995 14:55:18 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 19 I c-jnrb@blab01.math.utah.edu (Rian B. Jensen) writes: >when it comes to that sort of stuff? If they're going to be fucking >that young anyway it'd be *real* nice if they'd know enough to use >protection. NO! They are NOT going to be using it that young and I question your scrooples using the "F" word about BABIES!
From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Newsgroups: alt.atheism Subject: Re: Hey Brice- READ THIS!!! Date: 3 Oct 1995 10:50:03 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 27 st86m@Rosie.UH.EDU (slobbering skeleton) writes: >I used to think you were funny, but now you are arousing my hatred and >I don't like it when that happens. Just go the fuck away and shoot >yourself you maggot. From the messages I have read to me and about me I seem to have aroused hatred twords me a long time ago. I've been getting posts like yours for a long time reading drink Draino and other things. I have been able to add little in regard to a better way of living because Atheists are very good at side tracking. Feel free not to write, or read a post that might have my name. I'm truly sorry you feel the way you do.
From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.origins,alt.christnet Subject: Re: PSYCHO DAVE NEEDS INFO ON BRICE Date: 3 Oct 1995 11:04:37 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 34 psycho0@ix.netcom.com (Psycho Dave ) writes: >I REALLY think it would be very cruel to call the cops on him, because >the laws are so stacked against men in general in this state, that we >would be screwing him more than he needs to be screwed. It would be >BEYOND cruel. What you say about the laws being stacked against men in Mass. is right, but the fact is it never happened, not now, not ever. The reply I made was in sarcism only. Someone at another time suggested that is what I did, I replied, "No, all one has to do is look, "MAYBE'stick a finger in a little". Thats not to say it happened. A complaint filed against me would be fruitless because I live alone and never have been around children alone. To place such an accusation in a faq file on your web site as a fact would be VERY wrong indeed. I've been called everything but a child of GOD for some time now, including a troll. Now they got a flame and can't handle it, too bad, but thats all it was, a flame. --
From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Newsgroups: alt.atheism Subject: Re: Brice thread #5278 Date: 3 Oct 1995 11:13:52 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 25 "K. Tewson" writes: >Mary too was without sin, but Jesus was without sin as well. > >Wait. I thought we were all sinners. How did Mary pull that one off? WOW, you do ask graet questions, I wasn't ready for that one. Mary in a sense was pre-ordained, it was planned. The problem was on Joseph's side of the family, the christ couldn't come from the house of David, Joseph was in the family of King David. That side of the family was cursed, but thats where the Holy Spirit came into play. Mary only carried and gave birth to Jesus, Jesus otherwise was purley spiritual.
Msg#:21767 *Flame Brice* 10-05-95 07:29:52 From: BRICE WELLINGTON To: PSYCHO DAVE Subj: REPLY TO MSG# 21725 (OBSESSION!!) Look you! Get your facts straight! I said I was being called a troll and flamer on the net by atheists, so I took "THEM" for a ride with a flame! What a fuckin EVIL bastard you are! Liar too! When I first mentioned trillifon you said okee dokie, I'll "just" post this on the bullet, you spread it over the FUCKIN world on the Net in A.A and on a stupid FAQ file. I've decided you can't be trusted.
Article: 235418 Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Masturbation!!!? Date: 14 Oct 1995 10:05:00 GMT LADY DEATH writes: > In *MY* experience Bwicey, it's not just "may fondle", it's >*NECESSARY* to fondle! :) I'm sorry to hear that, really. >Well, please explain to this ignorant pagan/wicca, exactly how >the male is supposed to make love to the female, much less impregnate >her if he *DOESN'T* *touch* her, When I said not to touch her thing I meant rub it or finger it with the hand, of course you both have to connect. A side note to all, Next generation software updated its spell checker to work in WIN 95 note pade and word, it also works in Netcom Netcruiser. I can now spell check my replies and E-Mail. There is a small glitch they have to fix, in news groups I can spell check replies only, if I start a new message I'm out of luck.
Article: 235420 Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.religion.mormon,alt.at heism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Masturbation!!!? Date: 14 Oct 1995 10:17:06 GMT timh@halcyon.com (Tim Hill) writes: >you're a virgin aren't you. I am NOT a male virgin, I have been around! There was a period in my life when all I did was have ilicid sex with women, and when things slowed down I masturbated to the point where I lost a testicle. Many of us, (Men of God) had another life before we were saved. We speak from experience, no idle chat. REPENT!
Article: 235421 Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.religion.mormon,alt.at heism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Masturbation!!!? Date: 14 Oct 1995 10:21:14 GMT mancini@starbase.neosoft.com (Dr. Michael Mancini) writes: >Are you speaking for the LDS, or is this just based on your own, >obviously limited, view of women? My views are based on proper morals and biology.
Article: 235423 Newsgroups: alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Masturbation!!!? Date: 14 Oct 1995 10:23:48 GMT ajperez@prairienet.org (Antonio J. Perez) writes: >a woman anyway. However, it is very necessary that the woman be turned >on before sex also. otherwise it hurts. >laura Perez >Head of Household Laura, there is vasoline, KY and other lubricants on the market. If having a naked body next to you doesn't "turn you on" buy one.
Article: 235426 Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.religion.mormon,alt.at heism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Bryce's Prurient Posts (was Re: Masturbation!!!?) Date: 14 Oct 1995 10:27:34 GMT mancini@starbase.neosoft.com (Dr. Michael Mancini) writes: >Since when is foreplay unnatural? Kissing is foreplay, hugging and even talking, but to go below the belt is WRONG!
Article: 235427 Newsgroups: alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Questions to make Christians sweat Date: 14 Oct 1995 10:36:51 GMT ki7mh@delphi.com (Rob Wedlock) writes: >I love asking Christians the TOUGH questions. >I like to ask: >"So, one one hand God says.. Believe in me and you will go to heaven >and spend eternity in paradise. > >Reject me and you will spend eternity in hell. >Where is the middle ground?!?!?" >Thats one that usually makes them change the subject. I'll not back down! My dear person there is NO middle ground, no middle of the road. That is a common wish of a non believer, they want to go their own way. This is why people end up in HELL! If you don't accept Jesus, Jesus won't welcome you in Heaven, there is no other place to go but HELL! There is no LIMBO. >Another one is "So....... before about 2000 years ago or so, men didn't >worship a GOD, he worshiped GODS. GOD clearly says this is wrong. SO >are all those guys going to hell? That sure is allot of people" >They have allot of lame excuses for that one. There is but one GOD in Heaven! there are people today never mind 2000+ years ago who believe in gods and idles like Elvis or lamps. Yes dear one, those people like the people 2000+ years ago made GOD jelouse and are and will be in Hell. That is why I am here, with you today, so that you may live!
Article: 235438 Newsgroups: alt.christnet,alt.flame,aus.flame,aus.flame.usa,alt.sex,alt.sex.masturba tion,alt.sex.motss,alt.atheism,alt.cascade From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: alt.fuck.the.skull.of.jesus Date: 14 Oct 1995 10:57:34 GMT psycho0@ix.netcom.com (Psycho Dave ) writes: >Zoraster rose from the dead. There are several Hindu legends >about people who came back from the dead. Are you going to write those >off? >Have you ever known people to die and come back to life before? David, there is a big difference in returning from the dead, raised and as Jesus was, ressurected. Those people who came back from being dead had to by the laws of God, die again, Jesus lives and will always lives.
Article: 235636 Newsgroups: alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Masturbation!!!? Date: 15 Oct 1995 01:05:31 GMT ajperez@prairienet.org (Antonio J. Perez) writes: >So what you're saying is that there should be no reason to ever touch >a man either. I mean, if having a naked body next to you doesn't turn >you onArticle: 235639 Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.religion.mormon,alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Masturbation!!!? Date: 15 Oct 1995 01:15:31 GMT ewill@zachary.spacenet.com (Eric Williams) writes: >: As I have written in the past, a woman may fondle to give a man an >: erection "if" he needs help in getting one. > >Um .. did anyone ELSE see the inherent contradiction in these >sentences? Nope > >[Do they have to be married first?] YES! > >: There is no need to touch or rub a woman, she doesn't require an >: erection. >oh, that's right, you never show her your "thing".) Of course she got a peek once in a while, it couldn't be helped, but it was just in passing, there was nothing sexual about it at the time. I respond to this only because it is being crossposted and there are many new readers who don't understand. I never undressed infront of my wife nor did she see me "excited" it was all under the blankets as it should be. Intercourse shouldn't be turned into something dirty and obscene. Its a gift from God for procreation only.
Article: 235658 Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Masturbation!!!? Date: 15 Oct 1995 01:40:11 GMT In <45p2v1$eso@news.tamu.edu> "Hmm.." writes: >Why? Does the bible says not to finger her ? Haven't you heard of >the joys of foreplay ? Foreplay is not in the Bible, vile acts is.
Article: 235660 Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.religion.mormon,alt.atheism,alt. sex.masturbation From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Masturbation!!!? Date: 15 Oct 1995 01:49:04 GMT flaagg@teleport.com (Flaagg) writes: >>>(brice you are not real it simply is not possible >>>that you exist) >> >>Many here say the same about JESUS! >>I include Psycho Dave. > > Psycho Dave is Jesus? God forgive you for even joking that way! NO! Psycho Dave said Jesus doesn't exist!
Msg#:21936 *Flame Brice* 10-14-95 08:52:50 From: BRICE WELLINGTON To: ALL Subj: I LOVE YOU ALL! I would like to take this time to say I'm sorry if I offended anyone in my quest to introduce you to a better way of life, a Christian life. I know its difficult to change for most of you, living the way you have been over the years, and hanging out here doesn't make it easier. It is saturday morning and I am on my knees as I type with my tears hitting the keyboard, I can hardly see the screen. I want you all saved from the depths of sin, including masturbation and obscene language of which your all so fluint in speaking. I will return when I am able to retain my composure. Brice Man Of God!
To: psycho0@ix.netcom.com From: psycho0@ix.netcom.com (Psycho Dave ) Subject: still More Brice Quotes Date: 17 Oct 1995 02:26:30 GMT dlloyd@inc.net (Don Lloyd) writes: >How very un-Christian of you, dipshit. Where's your other cheek? People have always distorted that, it was meant to say if something offends you turn the other cheek, attacking verbal or otherwise is another story. I am but human and subject to human emotions. I repent if my writing that phrase offended anyone, I love you all.
Article: 236402 Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.religion.mormon,alt.at heism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Masturbation!!!? Date: 17 Oct 1995 02:29:37 GMT dlloyd@inc.net (Don Lloyd) writes: >>Of course you know when you do that your licking urine as well, they >>don't always clean off properly. > >We always bathe first, then *everything* is squeaky and licky clean >before we start. You lie! First of all your not a woman, of course you should keep your thing clean. If a sexy woman approached you and groped you, you would be all over her like a spider, a bathe wouldn't enter your evil mind because your mind is not clean! Man of God!
Article: 236404 Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.religion.mormon,alt.at heism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Masturbation!!!? Date: 17 Oct 1995 02:33:51 GMT brothers@umbc.edu (Paul N. Brothers ; CHEM) writes: >I see. So the thing was removed at your insistance. >Why did you want it removed? Was it in constant pain? >Did it have a tumor or hernia? Why diddn't you just >ease off on the self gratification? Or was it that >you felt remorse over spilling your seed so much that >you wanted to teach yourself a lesson? Its better to pluck out an eye than to lose your soul, in my case it was a testicle. Yes, there was a great deal of pain involved.
Article: 236407 Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.religion.mormon,alt.at heism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Bryce's Prurient Posts (was Re: Masturbation!!!?) Date: 17 Oct 1995 02:38:22 GMT fortinbras@i-link.com (Fortinbras) writes: >>One can't help but touch them, its almost impossible not to. > >Gimme a break...if you can keep your hands off your own peepee, you >can keep 'em off a woman's tits...sheesh. You can put your hand on your thing to guide it in. >That's what you think...I'm feeling kinda infantile right now. I can see that, I pray for your soul. Man of God!
Article: 236433 Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.religion.mormon,alt.at heism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Bryce's Prurient Posts (was Re: Masturbation!!!?) Date: 17 Oct 1995 04:31:06 GMT malkinb7@ix.netcom.com (Michelle Malkin ) writes: >small hole in the appropriate area for procreative activities. Now, >why wouldn't a good Christian fellow like you get your little woman >such a gown to keep you both in line with the rules of decency. In >fact, you could probably wear such a gown yourself for the same >prupose. Oooooh, I'm betting that you regret not having done this >YEARS ago. My wife always wears a night gown to bed, it pulls up. Man of God!
Article: 236439 Newsgroups: alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: I love you all! Date: 17 Oct 1995 04:57:07 GMT Dear People, No doubt some have heard a message like this before from me, but when the thought of so many souls going to Hell comes to mind I get depressed. I sit at my computer until I fall off my chair and on my knees where I am now, tears hitting the keyboard and my screen not always visible through tears. In my quest to save souls I tend to get carried away and at times offend people with an occasional swear word, this is only because I am human with human emotions. I want you all to know I repent of my sins and will continue to work for you, on you for the Lord. Man of God!
Article: 236533 Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.religion.mormon,alt.at heism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Masturbation!!!? Date: 17 Oct 1995 12:10:36 GMT susanm@indirect.com (Susan C. Mitchell) writes: >something so horrifying that you can't *look* while you're doing it -- Put a mystery in your life, try not looking you might like it. Go under a blanket and close your eyes. Man of God!
Article: 236536 Newsgroups: alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Bryce's Prurient Posts (was Re: Masturbation!!!?) Date: 17 Oct 1995 12:15:22 GMT malkinb7@ix.netcom.com (Michelle Malkin ) writes: >>My wife always wears a night gown to bed, it pulls up. >I thought you said that your wife had left you. No, you were told that and I didn't deny it, but were still married and its legal under the law and by God. I never said divorce, try separation.
Article: 236537 Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.religion.mormon,alt.at heism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Bryce's Prurient Posts (was Re: Masturbation!!!?) Date: 17 Oct 1995 12:19:53 GMT susanm@indirect.com (Susan C. Mitchell) writes: >Explain about how letting an adult "suck on or nuzzle" the breasts is >the real cause of breast cancer, Bricey. First of all, a woman can only produce so much milk, and its not for her husband. With a husband sucking on them and nibbling without the woman getting pregnant is serious, a time comes when she is with child and can't produce, cancer forms. Man of God! BriceW@aol.com
Article: 236538 Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Bryce's Prurient Posts (was Re: Masturbation!!!?) Date: 17 Oct 1995 12:24:21 GMT In <45vicv$7ml@grid.Direct.CA> Sandy writes: >>> Actually, I think nipples were designed expressly for torture. >> >>Nipple Clamps! Nipple Clamps! YAY! > >SHHHHHHHHHHHHH! > >Don't tell Brice! He might figure out what a good time we're having >and who KNOW what'll happen then! Such practices are satanic, that is the source of which they came. Believe it or not, when you doing clamps and things you are worshiping Satan.
Article: 236539 Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Bryce's Prurient Posts (was Re: Masturbation!!!?) Date: 17 Oct 1995 12:27:11 GMT In <45vfss$7ml@grid.Direct.CA> Sandy writes: >You don't. If you loved your daughters you wouldn't have finger-fucked >them. If that's how you show love, I am tired of all these allegations, there is no truth to them what so ever, I never finger f.... anybody! This is all I have to say on the matter! Man of God!
Message: 6 Newsgroups: alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington) Subject: Re: Bryce's Prurient Posts (was Re: Masturbation!!!?) Date: 18 Oct 1995 00:00:42 GMT paul@scsn.net (Paul Wright) writes: >Brice-hole, is there ANY way some fresh ideas can get into your >head..? I have many things on my mind, but new people loggon all the time and read some of my older posts, I find myself answering them over an over. I would like to discuss inter racial dating and how it got Ms. brown and Ron Goldman killed. Man of God!
Message: 7 Newsgroups: alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington) Subject: Brice again,,, Date: 21 Oct 1995 11:55:37 GMT mandtbac@news.abo.fi (Mats Andtbacka) writes: >In other words, you are leaving alt.atheism effective immediately...? No! There are a number of new people here that haven't heard the word, I will be posting sometime today starting a new subject header and will be sticking to that one as much as possible. I have received several letters from alt.religion and others asking me not to send any replies there with questionable subject headers. I think Masturbation and the evils of it are important, and the reason its so bad is nobody talks or warns about it. BriceW Man of God! --------------------------------------------------- Article: 237843 Newsgroups: alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: I love you all! Date: 21 Oct 1995 12:00:45 GMT raymon@nyc.pipeline.com (Raymond Xue) writes: >I just want to have some fun with the bastard, I lied, I >just want to test if he is really that dumb. I was well aware that you lied, I am not dumb, never said I was. BriceW Man of God! --------------------------------------------------- BriceW@ix.netcom.com http://home.aol.com/BriceW
Article: 238293 Newsgroups: alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: Re: Out of control! Date: 23 Oct 1995 05:46:40 GMT mef4@aber.ac.uk (MARC EDWARD FORRESTER) writes: >Please explain your own interpretation of the word 'evil', since I am >fascinated to know how you decided that this includes having a wank. Evil is anything anti-God or anything God is against, certain sexual acts apply. BriceW Man of God! --------------------------------------------------- BriceW@ix.netcom.com http://home.aol.com/BriceW
Article: 238935 Newsgroups: alt.atheism From: BriceW@ix.netcom.com (Brice Wellington ) Subject: A better way of life! Date: 25 Oct 1995 11:54:20 GMT Dear people, Contrary to what many think here I am not out to convert anyone, it is my contention that after being introduced to a better way of life many will accept Jesus without being asked. This was my original mission here, many asked me questions about faith, God and Jesus and thus many threads were established, this was for the better I think. Times are horrible, children killing children and becoming drunks! The divorce rate is sky high and homosexuality is on the rise. These things and other things can all be improved if we revert to a better way of life, in some ways turning the page of time back to 1955, a very good year. By adopting certain measures we can cut down on crime, reduce aids and decrease the divorce rate. I will be writing messages in this thread with suggestions on what we can do to better ourselves and our homelife. Topics covered are the american home and family, disciplin in the home, the depths and evils of homosexuality and what it can do to you. I look forward to writing to you all soon, and reading your replies and requests for prayer. I take confessions daily, confession is good for the soul and can start you off in the right direction. I love you all! BriceW Man of God! Pastor and Teacher
Return